The Algorithms are in Charge

Democracy is dead. Social media algorithms are now the global government.

Algorithms provide decisive control of public opinion, making democracy obsolete. The only way to restore accountable democracy in the public interest is to wrest control of the algorithms away from unaccountable corporations.

Democracy cannot survive the deep levels of cult-like thought reform driven by social media algorithms. Whoever controls the algorithm controls the vote, and therefore—ultimately—policy. The question is no longer whether social media influences political outcomes, but to what extent the manipulation of information flows has replaced traditional governance.

For years, we worried about foreign election interference, media consolidation, and billionaire-backed disinformation networks. Those were all valid concerns, but they pale in comparison to the single most powerful force shaping global ideology today: engagement-driven algorithms. Social media isn’t just influencing politics—it’s replacing traditional modes of political and cultural persuasion with a closed feedback loop of radicalization.

The New Invisible Government

Once upon a time, television networks and newspapers had gatekeepers. Editors and producers, for all their flaws, at least attempted to maintain a baseline level of journalistic integrity. If you wanted to reach millions of people, you had to go through the filter of professional media. But now, that function has been outsourced to an automated system that cares only about engagement. The algorithm is now the most powerful force on Earth, dictating which ideas rise and which disappear into the void.

What makes this shift so dangerous is that engagement-based ranking doesn’t elevate truth—it elevates outrage, conspiracy, and emotion. Human psychology is wired to react to threats, real or perceived, and social media systems optimize for the most inflammatory content. The more extreme a post is, the more interaction it gets. The more interaction it gets, the more the algorithm boosts it. And so, lies and radicalization spread exponentially, while moderation and nuance sink into obscurity.

It is no accident that social media platforms are breeding grounds for cult-like thinking. The mechanics of algorithmic engagement mirror the psychological techniques of thought reform. Users are constantly rewarded for conforming to the ideological in-group and punished for dissent. “Liking” and “sharing” reinforce loyalty, while pile-ons and cancellations create fear of independent thinking. This is cultic behavior at a scale never before seen in human history, and it is driven not by any conscious effort, but by a cold, profit-maximizing machine.

A Force Multiplier for Existing Biases

There is an ongoing debate about whether social media is the primary cause of radicalization or merely a force multiplier. Some argue that the core issue is pre-existing belief systems—racism, religious extremism, and anti-science biases—that have always existed. By this logic, social media simply accelerates what was already there.

This view underestimates the scale and nature of algorithmic manipulation. While it is true that bad ideas have always been present, their transmission used to be constrained by physical and social limitations. A white supremacist in the 1980s might have had to seek out a fringe bookstore or join an underground meeting. Today, a curious teenager searching YouTube for “What’s wrong with feminism?” can be in a full-fledged far-right pipeline within hours. The difference is exponential amplification.

Algorithms do not just accelerate belief systems; they actively shape them. Users are nudged toward more extreme positions through recommendation engines designed to maximize engagement. Someone who starts out skeptical of vaccines may be pushed toward full-blown anti-vaccine conspiracies because those posts are more likely to keep them scrolling. Someone with mild conservative leanings may find themselves inundated with content demonizing immigrants, feminists, and LGBTQ people, because outrage is more profitable than rational discourse.

This is no longer a passive process of information consumption. It is an active process of belief engineering. The algorithm learns what makes you tick, and then it builds a reality around you to keep you addicted. This is why attempts to “debunk” misinformation so often fail—because social media does not just present false information; it builds an entire immersive world where that false information makes perfect sense.

Social Media and Thought Reform

Robert Jay Lifton, the psychiatrist who studied Chinese Communist "thought reform" programs in the 1950s, identified eight criteria of ideological indoctrination. Social media algorithms align eerily well with them.

The first is milieu control, where access to outside perspectives is systematically cut off. As users engage with one set of beliefs, opposing views are filtered out. Over time, alternative ideas become not just unfamiliar, but actively incomprehensible.

Then comes loading the language, where ideological in-groups develop their own jargon, reinforcing conformity and discouraging critical thinking. Terms like "fake news," "deep state," "groomers," and "woke mind virus" serve as linguistic shortcuts that shut down discussion rather than invite nuance.

Sacred science follows, in which the group’s ideology is treated as absolute truth, beyond question. On social media, ideological bubbles reinforce this effect by making any challenge to the in-group’s dogma seem like heresy. Debate is discouraged, while purity tests ensure compliance.

Mystical manipulation plays a key role in the algorithmic pipeline. Social media cultivates the illusion that users have independently “discovered” certain ideas when, in reality, they have been nudged toward them by unseen recommendation engines. People believe they are thinking for themselves, even as their thoughts are being guided by an opaque system designed to maximize profit.

Then there is demand for purity, where engagement algorithms encourage users to escalate their rhetoric in order to gain approval. Moderates are pushed aside as extremists set the tone, and users quickly learn that the more radical their statements, the more engagement they receive.

The dispensing of existence is the final and most dangerous piece. In cultic systems, those who reject the ideology are seen as non-persons. Social media reinforces this with constant dehumanization of out-groups, making it psychologically easier to justify violence against them. This was visible in Myanmar, where Facebook-fueled propaganda played a central role in the Rohingya genocide. It is visible in the U.S., where social media campaigns turn political opponents into existential threats.

These mechanisms function in tandem, creating a system that rewards ideological purity, insulates users from dissenting views, and primes them to see outsiders as dangerous. In other words: textbook thought reform, but automated and at global scale.

The Algorithm as an Authoritarian Tool

It is not just political extremists who understand the power of the algorithm—governments do too. China has perfected social media control with its Great Firewall and heavily moderated platforms like WeChat, Weibo, Douyin (China’s version of TikTok), and Baidu Tieba, where only state-approved narratives can go viral, and dissent is swiftly censored. Russia has weaponized VK (VKontakte) and Odnoklassniki to control domestic discourse while using platforms like Facebook and Twitter to sow chaos and misinformation in democratic elections worldwide. Telegram, while officially independent, has been widely exploited by Russian propagandists to spread state narratives, both within Russia and internationally. In India, government-aligned movements have leveraged Koo (India’s alternative to Twitter), ShareChat, and WhatsApp to amplify nationalist rhetoric, suppress dissent, and shape public opinion through coordinated disinformation campaigns. Right-wing movements in the U.S. have built entire disinformation ecosystems, exploiting algorithmic amplification to mainstream what would have once been considered fringe lunacy.

At the same time, the algorithmic nature of discourse means that centrists and moderates struggle to compete. Nuanced policy debates do not go viral. Deep investigative journalism does not get clicks. The entire structure of the internet is designed to reward extremism, meaning that the Overton Window shifts ever further toward reactionary politics. In the absence of serious regulation or intervention, social media platforms will continue pushing society toward authoritarianism, because authoritarianism thrives on propaganda, and propaganda thrives on the algorithm.

A Global Reckoning

The terrifying reality is that social media is not just influencing culture—it has become the dominant cultural force. And because platforms like Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok operate on a global scale, they are effectively the world’s most powerful governing bodies.

We are facing a future where national elections are determined not by policies or candidates, but by which faction can game the algorithm most effectively. Where mass belief formation is no longer organic, but dictated by opaque corporate systems optimized for profit and control. Where the most powerful people in the world are not presidents or prime ministers, but tech executives who answer to no one.

We are already living in a world where social media is not just a tool of radicalization—it has become the primary engine of global governance. The algorithmic takeover has already happened, shaping public perception, policy, and even the fate of democracies. The question is no longer whether we can prevent it, but whether we can wrest control back before it cements a future where truth, autonomy, and democratic decision-making are permanently subjugated to corporate and authoritarian interests.

---